Tampilkan postingan dengan label the latest news. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label the latest news. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 25 September 2011

Facebook refresh is a good thing

Facebook's homepage features a login form on t...Image via WikipediaIt’s that time of year again. The annual Facebook update that fills our news feeds with myriad grievances about how awful and confusing it is. Laments of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”



Memo to Mark Zuckerberg: People don’t like change. The main issue with Facebook’s frequent updates is that we’re constantly being forced to learn and relearn how features can be used to our benefit. The last few updates left me wondering if new features had the end user in mind at all — or if they were just attempts to compete with other popular platforms, such as Twitter, or drive value for brands.



But that all changed for me with this recent round of updates. In some ways, I believe we’re witnessing the “re-personalization” of Facebook.





One of my biggest issues with the platform started the minute they gave companies, politicians, organizations, family, best friends, fringe friends, co-workers and that guy you met on the airplane to Chicago equal billing on your news feed. In life, we’re able to choose what we want to read, who we want to talk to and how we interact with brands we like, but in virtual life, we lost the ability to filter out the things we’re not interested in.



This recent update has given us back some of the power by allowing us to indicate what types of updates we want, from whom. In other words, you no longer have to look at Bob’s daily photo-documentation of his lunch, but you can still see his status updates about the soccer team you both love. Moving forward, if our news feeds are still inundated with items that don’t interest us, we only have ourselves to blame.



And if going through your friend list person by person to decide what level of information you want to see from them sounds onerous, you can create lists that categorize friends, family, co-workers, acquaintances, etc. — instead of deciding “what” you’re interested, you can focus on “who” you’re interested in. The only issue with this approach is that the friends in question can see which list they’re on — a feature that’s fine if, as on Twitter, the lists you’re making are interest-focused (i.e., politics, food) and borderline offensive if the lists you’re making are relationship-focused (i.e., best friends).



The new Facebook features can help us connect in more meaningful ways with the people we know and care about, while also giving us a new opportunity to subscribe to profiles of people who share our interests or are leaders in areas in which we want information and opinions. We’ve been given more control over how we want to experience the platform, and now it’s up to us to use it.

Enhanced by Zemanta



'Sister Wives' Season 3 premiere: A new baby and viva Las Vegas!

sister-wives-season-3-premiere.jpg



On the Season 3 premiere of "Sister Wives," we join the Brown family in Las Vegas, where they have four homes all relatively near one another.



Baby Talk



It's time for Kody and Robyn to announce the new baby. Robyn fears her bestie in the family, Meri, will struggle with it because Meri can't have more kids. Yeah, that would be really hard. But if she can do it with the other wives, I think Meri will be OK. She's an awesome lady.



Robyn tells Meri before anyone else and they have a lovely moment where Meri is excited and they hug. Meri says in a talking-head that she feels bad that people have to be so sensitive to her on this issue.



That night, at a big family dinner, Kody announces the baby and everybody is really excited, except maybe Aspen, Hunter and Maddie. They don't seem thrilled (they're three of the teenagers). I'm particularly proud of Christine for being so happy. Mariah also slips out and Meri and Kody have to talk to her. She's upset for her mom, awww.



I bet this really makes Robyn feel like part of the family - her three aren't Kody's biological kids, so this is a big step for her feeling included. Surprisingly, Janelle is not as thrilled as Christine is.



But for her, it's more about the world being topsy-turvy from the move to Las Vegas and now this is just one more big thing. It's a lot to deal with. Janelle is struggling with not having work outside the home.







Teenage Angst



There is also a problem with the teenagers fitting in and the family finding a church. Instead of finding a church to join, they've been having services in their houses. But now the search is on, mostly because of finding a social outlet for their teenagers. They try out a local Presbyterian Church that has a youth group. Huh.



Pastor Ray at the church is totally cool with the kids coming to their church, so good for Pastor Ray. Christine is the only one who doesn't feel right about it. She makes an analogy to them pointing their children to the sharks and thinks that the kids should find their own way to a fellowship situation. That's a valid perspective, but Meri says this is akin to sending their kids to public school, which I also agree with.



They table the discussion. Later, the adults talk about it and Kody agrees that going to another faith is not the answer, but Janelle thinks it's a social thing. Kody says if they're going to do this, it needs to be an LDS church. Janelle feels like Kody has completely closed the discussion with his laying down of the law, but Janelle thinks they should run it by the two or three oldest children. Agree with Janelle.



They meet with the four or five oldest kids and the kids assure them they are making friends at school and some of them even have the same morals as the Brown kids. They tell the kids about the church they went to and the kids want to know why not LDS. Kody is worried about the same discrimination they found in Utah - but wouldn't the Presbyterians (or Lutherans or Catholics) also be a concern on that front?



Then it comes out that some of the kids are not so keen on polygamy or the Mormon church in general. And they think they are old enough to choose and they want to go to the Presbyterian church.



After the kids leave, Robyn is very strongly against not steering their kids into the religion they work so hard to practice. Man, they have to have a choice! You can't force them to be polygamists! They didn't choose to be born into a plural marriage family.



Backyard Shenanigans



In typical Las Vegas fashion, the backyard of every house is just rocks and cinderblock walls. Christine gets a wild hare up her shorts to make a backyard with a playhouse and a free-standing pool. It turns into a massive project, but eventually it's pretty awesome and they throw a party to do the big reveal. It's like we're watching HGTV!



Later, the families have a pool party for the teenagers and their friends from school. Janelle's house has an in-ground pool, it appears. The kids seem cool with everything. Even a few of the parents come over, so good for them! Hunter doesn't want to hang out, though. He just stays in his room. Aww. But he seems to be doing OK hanging out at Christine's house and taking care of Truely.



So what did you think of the Season 3 premiere? I was concerned this show would have lots its appeal by now, but it really hasn't. It's just so fascinating to watch.



Enhanced by Zemanta



Single-Sex Education Is Assailed in Report

Cover of "Dr. Sax"Cover of Dr. SaxSingle-Sex Education Is Assailed in Report



Single-sex education is ineffective, misguided and may actually increase gender stereotyping, a paper to be published Friday asserts.



The report, “The Pseudoscience of Single Sex Schooling,” to be published in Science magazine by eight social scientists who are founders of the nonprofit American Council for CoEducational Schooling, is likely to ignite a new round of debate and legal wrangling about the effects of single-sex education.



It asserts that “sex-segregated education is deeply misguided and often justified by weak, cherry-picked or misconstrued scientific claims rather than by valid scientific evidence.”



But the strongest argument against single-sex education, the article said, is that it reduces boys’ and girls’ opportunities to work together, and reinforces sex stereotypes. “Boys who spend more time with other boys become increasingly aggressive,” the article said. “Similarly, girls who spend more time with other girls become more sex-typed.”



The authors are psychologists and neuroscientists from several universities who have researched and written on sex differences and sex roles. The Science article is not based on new research, but rather is a review of existing research and writing.



The lead author, Diane F. Halpern, is a past president of the American Psychological Association who holds a chair in psychology at Claremont McKenna College in California. She is an expert witness in litigation in which the American Civil Liberties Union is challenging single-sex classes — which have been suspended — at a school in Vermilion Parish, La.



Arguing that no scientific evidence supports the idea that single-sex schooling results in better academic outcomes, the article calls on the Education Department to rescind its 2006 regulations weakening the Title IX prohibition against sex discrimination in education. Under those rules, single-sex classes may be permitted as long as they are voluntary, students have a substantially equal coeducational option and the school reasonably believes separation will produce better academic outcomes.



Russlynn H. Ali, the assistant secretary for civil rights at the Education Department, said it was reviewing the research. “There are case studies that have been done that show some benefit of single-sex, but like lots of other educational research, it’s mixed,” she said. “When you’re talking about separating students, treating them differently, you want to do it in a way that’s constitutional, and you want to make sure that there is adequate justification. We certainly want to safeguard against stereotyping.”



The article comes at a time when single-sex education is on the rise. There were only two single-sex public schools in the mid-1990s; today, there are more than 500 public schools in 40 states that offer some single-sex academic classes or, more rarely, are entirely single sex.



Many of them began separating the sexes because of a belief that boys and girls should be taught differently that grew out of popular books, speeches and workshops by Michael Gurian, Leonard Sax and others.



Dr. Sax, executive director of the National Association of Single Sex Public Education, was singled out for criticism in the Science article, for his teachings that boys respond better to energetic, confrontational classrooms while girls need a gentler touch.



“A loud, cold classroom where you toss balls around, like Dr. Sax thinks boys should have, might be great for some boys, and for some girls, but for some boys, it would be living hell,” Dr. Halpern said in an interview. She said that while girls are better readers and get better grades, and boys are more likely to have reading disabilities, that does not mean that educators should use the group average to design different classrooms. “It’s simply not true that boys and girls learn differently,” she said. “Advocates for single-sex education don’t like the parallel with racial segregation, but the parallels are there. We used to believe that the races learned differently, too.”



Dr. Sax criticized the article on many counts, and said it did not fairly reflect his current views. He vehemently rejected the comparison to racial segregation, and the use of the term “sex segregation.” Legally, race is a suspect category, while sex is not.



“We are not asserting that every child should be in a single-sex classroom, we are simply saying that there should be a choice,” Dr. Sax said in an interview.



The authors of the article, though, say that because there is no good scientific research backing such a choice, the government cannot lawfully offer single-sex education in public schools.



The article cites a review commissioned by the Education Department, comparing single-sex and coed outcomes, concluding that, “as in previous reviews,” the results are equivocal.



The article also said that research in other countries, and data from the Program for International Student Assessment, also found little overall difference between single-sex and coed academic outcomes.



While some studies have found better outcomes from single-sex schools, the article said, the purported advantages disappear when outcomes are corrected for pre-existing differences. For example, Chicago’s Urban Prep Charter Academy for Young Men, a school whose high college admissions rates were praised this year by Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, was subsequently criticized by the scholar Diane Ravitch as having test results that were actually lower than average on basic skills.



“This is very much a live issue, and I think it’s snowballing,” said Galen Sherwin, a staff lawyer for the Women’s Rights Project of the A.C.L.U., who is handling the Louisiana case. “I see news stories every single week about new proposals, usually based on the idea that boys and girls learn differently. Often it’s people who have attended training programs by Sax or Gurian, saying these programs will cater to boys’ and girls’ specific learning styles.”



Much of the impetus for single-sex public schooling came from popular books like Mary Pipher’s “Reviving Ophelia” and, especially, a 1992 report by the American Association of University Women, “How Schools Shortchange Girls.” But by 1998, when the association issued another report, saying that single-sex schooling was not the solution to problems of gender equity, the pendulum had swung, with boys’ difficulties in school receiving more attention, in part because of books like Dr. Sax’s “Why Gender Matters” and Mr. Gurian’s “The Wonder of Boys.”

Enhanced by Zemanta



Kamis, 22 September 2011

Tough Love for Knox and Hester

Tough Love for Knox and Hester


"We've got what we've got, and people need to embrace what we've got and stop (whining) about it," he said. "Things are not going to change, so why talk about them? If you're a true Bears fan why beat them up? They're ours. Let's embrace them so they know we love them and they'll continue to play to the best of their abilities. Complain about them at the end of the year. But right now, don't complain."

Perhaps Drake is right. We just need to use a wide-angle lens on the Bears receivers, tell them we love them and wait to judge until the season is over. And after we show the Bears receivers love, we'll be sure to give them orange slices, juice boxes, and invitations to our birthday party at Monkey Island.

It's not odd for Drake to protect his players, as he nearly ran over a group of reporters with a golf cart in Bourbonnais when a story was published that Knox had asked for a trade after losing his starting spot (OK, it was just me, and maybe I need to improve my reflexes). But does he really think fans should be satisfied with Sunday's performance?

The truth is that the Chicagoans love the Bears, and they're just showing the Bears receivers tough love. Though Williams will likely be back Sunday, Earl Bennett is likely out for the game. The Bears will be facing the Super Bowl champs. Though safety Nick Collins is out for the season, the rest of the Packers secondary will apply the same kind of pressure that the Saints did.

A true fan expects more out of the team they love, so Bears fans hope to see that Knox and Hester show that they can deal with the Packers defense to the best of their abilities. It's just some tough love, Coach Drake.

Enhanced by Zemanta



‘Person of Interest,’ Series Premiere: TV Recap

We begin with the sound of seagulls and the sight of breezy curtains. Reese (played by Jim Caviezel) is sexily shirtless and canoodling in bed with a pretty young woman. His voice is musing about how it is when you meet the right person…



Cut to Reese in a NYC subway car, and now he’s shaggy-haired and in need of a shower. His voice asks: but when the right person is taken from you, what do you become then?



Some thugs who are up to no good enter the car and their leader, Anton, tries to filch Reese’s bottle of whiskey. In a display of supersharp reflexes, Reese grabs hold of Anton’s wrist and scares the bejeesus out of him. But does Anton walk away? No, he taunts some more until Reese flips out and displays straight kung fu style: he knocks three of the thugs out and has Anton in a chokehold, all in the span of five seconds.



The screen fades to fuzzy black and white, revealing that the entire scene has been filmed on security camera. And here we encounter one of the show’s major themes: civilian surveillance. The screen pans to hundreds of other black and white camera shots of ordinary life – the Brooklyn Bridge, the highway, a subway entrance, then a police station. Big Brother is always watching, and now we’re getting meta and watching people just like you and me being watched.



Inside a police station, we’re introduced to another main character, Detective Carter, played by Taraji P. Henson. She’s got no time for the four thugs who sit in the station, not knowing who or what hit them (maybe it was that feisty attitude, Anton). We find out “the bum” who is responsible for this is being held in the station for questioning. Det. Carter watches the tape of the subway brawl (Big Brother benefits law enforcement!) and knows right away that this “bum” is different.



She goes to question the mysterious man, who seems to know the drill already. She tells him she suspects he spent time in the service and tries to get info out of him. He’s short on words but he willingly drinks out of a plastic cup of water she has offered him. Det. Carter says she knows making the transition back from serving in the military is difficult. “Of course, some other guys I knew, they done so many evil things, they felt like they needed the punishment,” she says, while replaying the tape of his subway brawl.



In another room, she runs a background check using his fingerprints left on the plastic cup. Turns out his prints have been found at half a dozen crime scenes over the years, and he has open warrants in various countries.



Meanwhile, a stranger in a suit walks into the station and asks to see “my client.” Moments later, he walks out with Reese. When they are outside, Reese wants to know who’s responsible for this. The answer: “our employer” as Reese is put in a car and taken to a secluded spot underneath the Queensboro Bridge. A man in a dark jacket is waiting with his back to us.



And here we’re introduced to the third main character in the show: we hear his voice before we see him, and it’s unmistakable to anyone who was a fan of “Lost.” It’s Michael Emerson, playing Mr. Finch, a man who says he knows “exactly everything” about Reese: the government work he used to do, the assumption by everyone that he’s dead, and the fact that he has contemplated killing himself.



Reese is understandably freaked out and has no idea who this rich, bespectacled man is or why he brought him here. “Knowledge is not my problem. Doing something with that knowledge, that’s where you’d come in,” Mr. Finch says. He thinks they can help one another, and tells Reese he can give him a job.



Suddenly we’re in midtown, in the middle of a pack of commuters. Mr. Finch, who has a limp, waxes philosophic about how none of the 8 million people knows what’s coming next. Mr. Finch says he knows when someone is going to be involved in a murder or kidnapping. He points to one woman in particular, who is buying a cup of coffee from a street vendor and says she is at the top of his list this week. He doesn’t know if she’s the victim or the perpetrator, but she’s involved in some crime, and he wants Reese to follow her and stop it from happening. Reese, for his part, isn’t having any of it. He walks away, but not before drop-kicking two of Mr. Finch’s security men who try to stop him.



In what appears to be a hotel or a rented room, Reese is suddenly short-haired and shaven, resembling Jim Caviezel again. He’s watching a martial arts video and drinking himself unconscious with whiskey. Dreams of those gauzy curtains and that pretty woman in a tropical room again, in what we’d have to believe is a distant memory.



But a phone ringing wakes Reese from the dream, and he’s now tied to a headboard in a fancy room. The sound of screaming can be heard in the next room, a woman being attacked. Reese’s fighter instincts kick in and he frees himself and bursts into the other room, only to find the screaming is actually a recording. Mr. Finch is sitting with his back to us (what’s with showing us his back?). The recording is of a murder that happened three years ago. Mr. Finch says Reese was too late, then goes for the jugular and says, “Just like you were too late for your friend Jessica. You were halfway around the world when she was killed.” Ah, so that’s the woman in the tropical dreams?



Reese pins Mr. Finch against a wall and Mr. Finch pleads it’s the truth, and he’ll never lie to him, unlike the government. He offers Reese a chance to save the woman who will be in the violent crime this week – a chance to be there in time, he stresses. Reese looks angry and distrustful, but this time he’s listening. Why does he trust him? Maybe he’s got nothing better to do, and he’s obviously got the job skills.



They go to Mr. Finch’s office in an abandoned library, climbing an elegant staircase amid fallen books and scaffolding. Mr. Finch gives Reese driver’s licenses, credit cards, cover identities, and instructions on how to get money. On the wall is a list of social security numbers that are mapped out to a violent crime.



The woman who will be involved in the violent crime this week, the person of interest, is Diane Hanson, an assistant DA for the city. They follow her around in midtown again (they actually follow her a little too closely, but she’s oblivious). Reese says the quick way to learn all about the asset is: break into her apartment, download personal info from her computer, hack into her cellphone and use GPS to track her and listen in on her conversations. Oh, and a wireless camera tracks her everywhere. This show is clearly going to fan our neurotic flames.



The violent crime may have to do with the case Hanson’s working on – Lawrence Pope, who Hanson is prosecuting, who’s on trial for killing his friends in a drug deal. Is Hanson being targeted by Pope’s gang? Or is it her ex Wheeler, who works in the same office? Cue sudden, paranoid thoughts by those of you who’ve ever dipped your pen in the office ink.



Reese eavesdrops on a conversation between Hanson and Pope in his jail cell, and Pope attacks her and tells her to keep her mouth shut. Reese believes whoever framed Pope will be coming after her, and he seeks out Pope’s brother for more information.



Another cutaway to the dream sequence, and we learn that Reese and Jessica were on this getaway in Mexico when the Sept. 11 attacks happened.



More security camera shots transition us back to Hanson. Reese is spying on her and Wheeler in their office, while communicating to Mr. Finch by phone (he’s nothing if not a multitasker). But Wheeler logs onto Hanson’s computer while she’s not looking, and prints out some information. Something smells rotten in the Assistant DA’s office.



Reese finds Pope’s brother at his school and has to chase him down. He tells the brother he needs to come with him, and the brother yells to passersby that the man is trying to put him in a cab and take pictures of him (quick thinking, actually) so Reese lets him go, but not before slipping a cellphone in the brother’s backpack that will track him (who’s the quick one now?)



All of a sudden Reese is back in Mr. Finch’s office at the decrepit library. He travels fast. He decides to pay a visit to the thug he beat up, Anton, who is at a warehouse with others with a new shipment of guns. Reese uses some fancy firearm-work to take control of the situation, grab all the guns and go.



Mr. Finch and Reese overhear Pope’s brother being kidnapped by unknown men. Mr. Finch is bug-eyed and raising his voice on the phone, while Reese is calmly getting out of a cab at 97th and Riverside. In the coolest scene of the episode, he puts on a ski mask and whips out a rifle, and shoots at the SUV holding Pope’s brother. The car swerves, the two other men are injured, and Reese pulls out the brother unharmed. He realizes after taking one of the men’s ID that they are actually police.



Reese and Mr. Finch stroll through Central Park, and Reese tells him it’s a group of corrupt cops who are involved in narcotics deals. Pope is likely framed for a murder involving them.



Mr. Finch reveals that when the towers came down, he was working at a lucrative job. After Sept. 11, he was hired to design a machine to detect possible terrorist activity. But the machine was meant to prevent the next Sept. 11, and anything deemed “irrelevant” was erased. But that “irrelevant” list also pointed to violent crime, and has been eating away at him. “The machine is everywhere, watching us with 10,000 eyes, listening with a million ears,” he says eerily (it’s so good to have you back, Michael Emerson). He’s able to communicate with the machine to access the “irrelevant” list – just social security numbers.



Meanwhile, Det. Carter learns that the thugs were taken out by just one guy again, and she knows it must be her “bum.” Who is this guy, and what’s he doing on her turf?



Pope was killed in his cell, and Reese knows the crime involving Hanson is about to happen. He spies on an impromptu meeting in a deserted alley. It’s amazing how he never looks tired. In a twist, it’s revealed that Hanson isn’t about to be attacked. She’s actually the ringleader of the bad cops, and says the problem is now her ex, Wheeler, because he knows what’s going on. She gives the order to “take care” of Wheeler. Reese is uncharacteristically found out – one of the cops approaches him from behind. They gather around and interrogate him, then punch him while Hanson walks away, making threats that they need to clean up the mess.



Reese wakes up in the back of a police car, on the way to Oyster Bay. He tricks the cop driving the car, detonating an explosive. Hate when that happens! The car overturns, he crawls out and pulls out the cop, unlocks his own handcuffs, checks to see if the cop is wearing a bulletproof vest, and shoots him. It’s as if he’s done this a thousand times.



Now it’s Wheeler who is the person of interest. Reese goes to Wheeler’s apartment, but three of the bad cops are already there, ready to “take care” of Wheeler. They bring an ex-con whom Wheeler put away to do the actual deed. Wheeler is about to come down the elevator with his son, Henry. As the cops prep the ex-con to kill, Reese appears and takes one of the cops hostage, shaking his head at the other. Wheeler and Henry leave unharmed.



Then, a faceoff between Reese and the other cop, who is still holding the ex-con hostage. Reese lets two of the cops go. He tells the remaining cop he has no friends or family, so he’s got nothing to lose. Cut to a shot of the building’s entrance. We hear two shots, and the freed ex-con runs out the door.



In the courtroom, Hanson is about to give evidence on a recorded phone call. It turns out to be her voice, giving the order to “take care of Wheeler.” All is revealed.



Reese is in the police car with the cop he surprised on the way to Oyster Bay and let live. Reese tells the cop that it was his gun used to kill his partner at Wheeler’s apartment, the cop who everyone now thinks is in witness protection. But the body is actually in the trunk. So the cop has no choice but to bury the body, out in Oyster Bay. The cop must secretly work for Reese to protect his innocence. Reese has a mole on the inside now.



Reese goes back to Mr. Finch under the Queensboro Bridge. Mr. Finch says he’s been watching Reese for a long, long time. It’s revealed that the world thinks both of them are dead. “You’re not the only one that’s lost someone,” Mr. Finch tells him. He offers him an out – money to disappear if he no longer wants to continue. The alternative is a mission that will probably result in both of them being dead.



In the final scene, Det. Carter is putting the remaining bad cop in a car and telling him she needs to find the guy who acted alone. Reese overhears, and knows she’s now on his tail. He stares at a security camera and the screen pans out to a server farm, with row upon row of data being collected and stored.

Enhanced by Zemanta



She’ll Stick to Apotheker’s HP Strategies: Whitman

This sign welcomes visitors to the headquarter...Image via WikipediaHewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ) Chief Executive Officer Meg Whitman plans to stick by strategies set in motion by her predecessor, Leo Apotheker, betting that investors prefer steady leadership to another unsettling change of course.

Whitman, in her first interview as Hewlett-Packard’s CEO, said the company stands by plans to acquire U.K. software marker Autonomy Corp. for $10.3 billion. The company also will continue to explore whether to sell or spin off the personal-computer division, she said. Those moves were announced on Aug. 18.

“It does not signal a change in the strategy,” Whitman said yesterday of her appointment. “We are behind the actions that were taken on Aug. 18. We are firmly committed to Autonomy.”

Whitman is hewing to those plans to avoid alienating shareholders who were fed up with the about-faces that characterized Apotheker’s reign. Still, Hewlett-Packard is overpaying for Autonomy and it shouldn’t have announced a possible PC unit sale without a concrete plan in place, said Chris Whitmore, an analyst at Deutsche Bank AG.

“We’re going to get more of the same from a Meg Whitman- led HP as we did from a Leo-led HP,” said Whitmore, who is based in San Francisco and has a “sell” rating on Hewlett- Packard. “The board isn’t going to change the strategy and is going to continue down this path, which frankly was the fear.”

Apotheker, CEO for less than 11 months, was ousted yesterday after cutting sales forecasts three times and making strategy shifts that blindsided investors. Palo Alto, California-based Hewlett-Packard also said Chairman Ray Lane will become executive chairman.

‘Heavily Scrutinized’

Whitman’s challenge will be boosting revenue while assuaging the investors whose dismay fueled a 47 percent plunge in Hewlett-Packard stock under Apotheker. She said the company will decide the outcome of the PC business as soon as possible.

“We’ll make a decision as fast as we possibly can,” she said in the interview. “We understand uncertainty doesn’t help the business, doesn’t help customers, doesn’t help shareholders.”

Her experience at consumer-oriented companies such as EBay Inc. (EBAY), Procter & Gamble Co. (PG) and Hasbro Inc. (HAS) may leave her ill- equipped to run Hewlett-Packard’s business-computing divisions, said Shaw Wu, an analyst at Sterne, Agee & Leach Inc. in San Francisco.

“She’s going to be heavily scrutinized,” said Wu, who has a “neutral” rating on the shares. “She doesn’t have the background to turn around HP.”

Whitman as Communicator

An estimated 25 percent of Hewlett-Packard’s sales come from consumers, Wu said. “What about the other 75 percent?”

Whitman defended her record at the helm of EBay.

“I have run a large company -- not obviously as large as HP, but I have run a very large company,” she said. “While I don’t have years of experience in an enterprise business, I bought a lot of software. I was one of the largest enterprise customers in Silicon Valley.”

“That’s like saying, ‘I’ve bought an iPhone, so I can run Apple Inc. (AAPL)” said Whitmore at Deutsche Bank.

Whitman will need to take Hewlett-Packard’s disparate operating groups -- including data-center computing gear, technology services, printers, and software -- and get them working as a team, Lane said in the interview. He also lauded Whitman’s ability to communicate company strategy.

“The market’s a little confused because we’re in so many different businesses,” he said. “This is 90 percent about leadership, communications and operating execution.”

Internet Pioneer

Lane, who considered becoming the CEO himself, said Hewlett-Packard executives weren’t working well under Apotheker. To explain why the board picked an outsider, Lane said on a conference call that internal managers “were not ready” to become CEO.

The stock jumped 6.7 percent on Sept. 21 after Bloomberg reported that Apotheker would be ousted, evidence that shareholders were relieved to see his tenure end. Hewlett- Packard fell $1.18, or 4.9 percent, to $22.80 yesterday on the New York Stock Exchange.

Whitman, 55, is credited with helping build EBay into the world’s largest Internet auctioneer, with a market value of about $40 billion. She took the company public and built an online storefront that helped thousands of small businesses peddle their wares. Yet in her final years at EBay, she couldn’t reverse a slowdown in sales growth and overpaid for Skype Technologies SA after a bidding war with Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. EBay later wrote down Skype’s value.

Pressure on Apotheker

Whitman joined Hewlett-Packard’s board in January after a failed bid to become California’s governor last year. Before EBay, Whitman worked as an executive at the toy company Hasbro, the floral service FTD Inc., footwear maker Stride Rite Corp. and Walt Disney Co. (DIS)

Hewlett-Packard had revenue of more than $126 billion in the past fiscal year, almost 14 times the size of EBay’s sales.

“It’s not clear to me that someone who spent 30 years in the consumer space is the right person for an enterprise technology company,” said Dana Stalder, a partner at venture- capital firm Matrix Partners in Palo Alto. Stalder worked under Whitman for seven years at EBay.

Pressure on Apotheker intensified when in August he announced the overhaul that included the Autonomy deal and possible spinoff. He also killed off the company’s WebOS tablets and smartphones, five months after vowing to put the operating system on a full range of the company’s computers.

Hewlett-Packard Forecasts

Hewlett-Packard Chief Financial Officer Cathie Lesjak, who served as interim CEO before Apotheker, said yesterday on a conference call that the company was no longer confident in its fourth-quarter sales guidance. Hewlett-Packard is sticking by its profit forecast, she said.

The company said in August that fourth-quarter revenue would be $32.1 billion to $32.5 billion, with earnings of $1.12 to $1.16 a share, excluding some costs. According to Bloomberg data, analysts are predicting sales of $32.2 billion and profit of $1.14 for the period.

The board weighed whether to oust Apotheker for six to eight weeks, Lane said in the interview.

Apotheker stands to receive cash severance of at least $7.2 million, a figure that could be higher if his annual bonus was set above the minimum $2.4 million laid out in the employment agreement. Including his $1.1 million in salary received for the first year, along with a $4 million cash signing bonus and a $4.6 million relocation payment, Apotheker will have earned about $34.7 million in cash and stock for less than a year’s work.

‘Investors Wound Up’

“Not bad for a short-term job, unless you’re a HP shareholder,” said Brian Foley, a compensation consultant in White Plains, New York. “This is yet another ex-CEO of Hewlett- Packard who does very well despite the circumstances.”

Apotheker joined Hewlett-Packard after Mark Hurd departed as CEO amid a scandal over a personal relationship with a company contractor. Hurd now is a co-president at Oracle.

A steady hand may be just what Hewlett-Packard needs, said Jayson Noland, an analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co. in San Francisco. He has a “neutral” rating on the stock.

“The board is directionally behind the plan Apotheker’s put in place,” Noland said. “It’s just the execution of that plan that has investors wound up.”

Enhanced by Zemanta